<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers Face New FTC Scrutiny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/</link>
	<description>Wine Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:57:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roxanne Darling</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-47228</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxanne Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1296#comment-47228</guid>
		<description>In addition to the voluntary compliance, I think the main targets will be not just every blogger but the truly influential bloggers - and they are easy to find. There is much about the blogosphere that is self-policing, or should I say those who delight in outing others.  I agree with you that the ethics should initiate with the writer/blogger for all to benefit the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the voluntary compliance, I think the main targets will be not just every blogger but the truly influential bloggers &#8211; and they are easy to find. There is much about the blogosphere that is self-policing, or should I say those who delight in outing others.  I agree with you that the ethics should initiate with the writer/blogger for all to benefit the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-44328</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1296#comment-44328</guid>
		<description>Ignoring the issue that enforcement of these new guidelins, I do think that most professional wine critics (WS, WA, etc.) satisfy these standards.  For example, professional wine critics do not provide readers/consumers with itemized lists of gifts (e.g., food, etc.) or gifted services (e.g., travel/airfare, etc.).  Having said this, I do believe that journalists should disclose any (direct or indirect) compensation received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring the issue that enforcement of these new guidelins, I do think that most professional wine critics (WS, WA, etc.) satisfy these standards.  For example, professional wine critics do not provide readers/consumers with itemized lists of gifts (e.g., food, etc.) or gifted services (e.g., travel/airfare, etc.).  Having said this, I do believe that journalists should disclose any (direct or indirect) compensation received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-43897</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1296#comment-43897</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the comment.  While it is without a doubt true, on the one hand, that the FTC, should the guidelines be approved in their current form, will face a daunting challenge, but on the other hand, the guidelines&#039; &lt;em&gt;intent&lt;/em&gt; is &lt;em&gt;not enforcement&lt;/em&gt; per se, but to promote &lt;em&gt;voluntary compliance&lt;/em&gt;.  The FTC&#039;s larger idea is that bloggers should no longer be exempt from &#039;truth in advertising&#039; regulations, and, most importantly, that consumers will positively benefit from a blogger&#039;s disclosure.  

This has nothing to do with intrusive govt. regulation, in my opinion.  It is about encouraging bloggers to provide the consumer with relevant information so that they might make an informed purchasing decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comment.  While it is without a doubt true, on the one hand, that the FTC, should the guidelines be approved in their current form, will face a daunting challenge, but on the other hand, the guidelines&#8217; <em>intent</em> is <em>not enforcement</em> per se, but to promote <em>voluntary compliance</em>.  The FTC&#8217;s larger idea is that bloggers should no longer be exempt from &#8216;truth in advertising&#8217; regulations, and, most importantly, that consumers will positively benefit from a blogger&#8217;s disclosure.  </p>
<p>This has nothing to do with intrusive govt. regulation, in my opinion.  It is about encouraging bloggers to provide the consumer with relevant information so that they might make an informed purchasing decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blog Wine Cellar</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-43871</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blog Wine Cellar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 06:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1296#comment-43871</guid>
		<description>The FTC will never be able to enforce these laws because there are just to many bloggers out there and virtually everyone is making their opinions known online. It would be hard to prove someone was recieveing compensation for positively reviewing products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FTC will never be able to enforce these laws because there are just to many bloggers out there and virtually everyone is making their opinions known online. It would be hard to prove someone was recieveing compensation for positively reviewing products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur, winesooth</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-43720</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur, winesooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1296#comment-43720</guid>
		<description>May 6th. Youtube has only excerpts. CSPAN had the whole thing until recently. Maybe deeper searching of that archive will turn up something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May 6th. Youtube has only excerpts. CSPAN had the whole thing until recently. Maybe deeper searching of that archive will turn up something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-43712</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1296#comment-43712</guid>
		<description>Nice to hear from you, Arthur.  I&#039;ve read accounts of the hearing but I did not watch the hearing itself.  I&#039;ll try to find it.  It was held in early May, I believe.  Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear from you, Arthur.  I&#8217;ve read accounts of the hearing but I did not watch the hearing itself.  I&#8217;ll try to find it.  It was held in early May, I believe.  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur, winesooth</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/05/21/bloggers-face-new-ftc-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-43708</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur, winesooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1296#comment-43708</guid>
		<description>Hi Ken

Did you catch the (nearly two hour) congressional hearing about the future of journalism. Headed up by John Kerry, the hearing addressed blogging as well. the CSPAN web site had the video, but it&#039;s no longer available</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken</p>
<p>Did you catch the (nearly two hour) congressional hearing about the future of journalism. Headed up by John Kerry, the hearing addressed blogging as well. the CSPAN web site had the video, but it&#8217;s no longer available</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

