<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wines, They Are A-Changin&#8217;?  The New EU Regulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reignofterroir.com/2009/06/21/the-wines-they-are-a-changin-the-new-eu-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/06/21/the-wines-they-are-a-changin-the-new-eu-regulations/</link>
	<description>Wine Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 21:11:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greybeard</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2009/06/21/the-wines-they-are-a-changin-the-new-eu-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-47751</link>
		<dc:creator>Greybeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=1699#comment-47751</guid>
		<description>I see that Decanter has published an article in September&#039;s edition on the same news, by Victoria Daskal (who contributes to JancisRobinson.com). Although I prefer mine (I am biased) her compact piece has a different take on 2 areas;
- that the 182 &quot;new&quot; Italian DOP &amp; IGP designations is incorrect, although no additional information to clarify what is.
- That new D.O. &amp; G.I. designations can be ommitted from the label if an existing AOC, DOC etc. is in place (although again, no references, and I did not interperet that from my read of the E.U. regulations).

Otherwise it&#039;s a good article, as you&#039;d generally expect from Decanter - even if it is a little late!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that Decanter has published an article in September&#8217;s edition on the same news, by Victoria Daskal (who contributes to JancisRobinson.com). Although I prefer mine (I am biased) her compact piece has a different take on 2 areas;<br />
- that the 182 &#8220;new&#8221; Italian DOP &#038; IGP designations is incorrect, although no additional information to clarify what is.<br />
- That new D.O. &#038; G.I. designations can be ommitted from the label if an existing AOC, DOC etc. is in place (although again, no references, and I did not interperet that from my read of the E.U. regulations).</p>
<p>Otherwise it&#8217;s a good article, as you&#8217;d generally expect from Decanter &#8211; even if it is a little late!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

