<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgan&#8217;s Halfway House For Wannabe Winemakers, pt. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reignofterroir.com/2010/02/01/morgans-halfway-house-for-wannabe-winemakers-pt-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2010/02/01/morgans-halfway-house-for-wannabe-winemakers-pt-2/</link>
	<description>Wine Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:26:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 1WineDude</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2010/02/01/morgans-halfway-house-for-wannabe-winemakers-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56868</link>
		<dc:creator>1WineDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=3313#comment-56868</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... wasn&#039;t aware of horn substitutions being allowed in BD winemaking...  I think someone needs to &#039;Scrabble challenge&#039; that one! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; wasn&#8217;t aware of horn substitutions being allowed in BD winemaking&#8230;  I think someone needs to &#8216;Scrabble challenge&#8217; that one! <img src='http://reignofterroir.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amaronese</title>
		<link>http://reignofterroir.com/2010/02/01/morgans-halfway-house-for-wannabe-winemakers-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56859</link>
		<dc:creator>Amaronese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reignofterroir.com/?p=3313#comment-56859</guid>
		<description>Though interesting and clearly somebody very passionate about wine making, it struck me Morgan seems to be a little bit on the sloppy thinking track when it comes to interventionism and biodynamics. Take the Maconellicoccus-infection in her vineyard: of course &#039;biodynamics&#039; as a principle is not going to solve it, but biodynamics as a frame of thought can be helpful to find the right thing to do. It&#039;s clear - to me, that is - that there is a severe problem with the micro-ecological equilibrium in the vineyard with such a large mealy bug infection. Just to spray - biodynammically/organically, whatever - is not going to take this out, because it&#039;s only fighting the symptoms, fighting the outcome and not taking out the germ, looking for the reason.
Same with her comments on acidification and fermentation problems with wild yeasts ... . 
Most organic, biodynamic, natural winegrowers I know don&#039;t like to talk about organic, biodynamic, natural winegrowing/making as a principle, a set of directives (or even worse: this astrological gibberish, which is just a huge cliché btw). They just make wine in the best possible way, with hard work and supreme vigilance in the vineyard as well as in the cellar and, of course, a lot of careful thinking. Even then sometimes things go wrong, but not always for the worst. I have some of J-M Brignot&#039;s Savagnin 2004 in the cellar, which is just the best wine vinegar I ever had ... .
This is an extreme example of course. I don&#039;t want to preach non-interventionism and all that jazz here, it&#039;s just that considering the theory of biodynamics or organic winegrowing bottom-up, starting from what you have in the vineyard, instead of top-down could maybe help.
Pity her wines are so difficult to get here in the EU. I will definitely try to lay hands on some bottles when I am in MN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though interesting and clearly somebody very passionate about wine making, it struck me Morgan seems to be a little bit on the sloppy thinking track when it comes to interventionism and biodynamics. Take the Maconellicoccus-infection in her vineyard: of course &#8216;biodynamics&#8217; as a principle is not going to solve it, but biodynamics as a frame of thought can be helpful to find the right thing to do. It&#8217;s clear &#8211; to me, that is &#8211; that there is a severe problem with the micro-ecological equilibrium in the vineyard with such a large mealy bug infection. Just to spray &#8211; biodynammically/organically, whatever &#8211; is not going to take this out, because it&#8217;s only fighting the symptoms, fighting the outcome and not taking out the germ, looking for the reason.<br />
Same with her comments on acidification and fermentation problems with wild yeasts &#8230; .<br />
Most organic, biodynamic, natural winegrowers I know don&#8217;t like to talk about organic, biodynamic, natural winegrowing/making as a principle, a set of directives (or even worse: this astrological gibberish, which is just a huge cliché btw). They just make wine in the best possible way, with hard work and supreme vigilance in the vineyard as well as in the cellar and, of course, a lot of careful thinking. Even then sometimes things go wrong, but not always for the worst. I have some of J-M Brignot&#8217;s Savagnin 2004 in the cellar, which is just the best wine vinegar I ever had &#8230; .<br />
This is an extreme example of course. I don&#8217;t want to preach non-interventionism and all that jazz here, it&#8217;s just that considering the theory of biodynamics or organic winegrowing bottom-up, starting from what you have in the vineyard, instead of top-down could maybe help.<br />
Pity her wines are so difficult to get here in the EU. I will definitely try to lay hands on some bottles when I am in MN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
